I contacted the Reddit writer and asked if I could please reprint his rant and he said sure, because his truth is our mission: More childhood — and parent — independence!
I don’t agree with every word, of course. I think parenting has always required effort. But today’s demands ARE pointlessly relentless:
*
LET’S BE REALISTIC: THE BIRTHRATES ARE LOW BECAUSE KIDS ARE SEEN AS A LIFESTYLE DECISION
By KnightErrant21
Back when birthrates were high, people barely put effort into parenting. [But now] not putting in effort with your kids is seen as borderline child abuse. And thus, people who don’t think they can adequately put in the effort don’t have kids.
The effort thing is very real. There are plenty of Gen Y and older millennials on here that openly talk about how they were left to do whatever, with Mom and Dad barely knowing they’re alive, only to have younger folks be absolutely horrified.
This goes well beyond any arguments about feminism — mom just wasn’t tearing her hair out to manage the household, because little Johnnies #3-6 were expected to make themselves scarce and give her the mental freedom to do so. They weren’t thought about while they weren’t in sight, so Mom had the mental capacity to do their thing.
Let tweens babysit!
Random 13-year-olds with questionable qualifications were hired to watch the kids on Friday nights so parents could go interact in a child-free environment. There was a plethora of these to choose from because they didn’t get spending money and were too young for a W2 job. And little Cindy was expected to be a reliable babysitter for her younger siblings by age 12 so Dad could save the $20. Kids just got bad grades, and they weren’t sent to tutors or given hours of help with their homework.
None of this flies in middle-class society today. Most parents I know don’t let their kids play even in the front yard unsupervised, let alone off the property. Kids have scheduled playdates since it’s hella rude to come up on someone’s house and expect interaction.
My friends use adult babysitters with lists of certifications and references, and (reasonably) pay the appropriate price for this.
Let parents take their eyes off their kids.
Kids aren’t left in the car anymore with the keys in and the AC on because a random misguided Samaritan might call the police.
Parents in my area are expected to show up to all kids’ rec sports practices in case of injuries, not just the games (granted, parents didn’t tend to do this 100% either).
Businesses don’t tend to hire teenagers because of liability, so kids have to be funded well through high school… And that’s if the state lets them work at all (my state allows kids under 16 an hour of paid work a weekend, over 16 is equally regulated). Kids often don’t work when there is an opportunity because they’re studying for college and parents that understand delayed gratification principles (and are willing to financially bear that delay). And grades are an entirely different snowball effect since college is a prerequisite to a living wage in every developed nation.
Let parents lead not-just-parenting lives.
Some of it’s good, obviously. Some of it is a reflection of today’s society. But honestly, it all snowballs into the idea that kids are more than a job. Jobs can be put down and changed and ignored. Kids are seen as a full-on lifestyle decision. The sacrifice is required from both parents. Even if you have a 50/50 workload household, modern parenting means centering your lives around getting your children into adulthood.
And honestly, in order to do this successfully at all, you have to drastically reduce the number of children you have. You can’t go to five sports practices twice a week and games on weekends. You can’t hire a childcare professional or a tutor at a reasonable rate for that many kids and still allow them to make close to a living wage. You can’t have an impactful conversation with a child about what’s upsetting them with four more of them trashing the living room. You can’t vet the families of every single friend, compounded by five, and determine individually if they’re safe for a playdate.
Let some of the demands go.
You can maybe do this with two, and if your personal management skills and income are at all PAR, you’ll maybe get this with one. But if you have more than that, it starts seeming like a situation of perpetually robbing Peter to pay Paul.
Tl;dr- We’ve basically developed into a society that parents have to be 100% in on their kids, and the birthrate is never going to recover as long as this is the case. It’s well beyond a two-parent job.
Lenore Here: The demands on parents’ time and finances have truly exploded. One way Let Grow (the nonprofit that grew out of Free-Range Kids) helps fight back some of this is by suggesting that schools stay open for all-ages free play – that is, developmentally rich fun that does not require driving, or fancy uniforms, or a parent’s attendance.
We also, of course, recommend The Let Grow Experience, which gets kids used to doing more on their own again.
Once our culture gets the message that asking too little of kids asks too much of parents, we can rest a little easier – for real. As you know, our motto at Let Grow is, “When adults step back, kids step up.” It’s also true that when kids step up, adults get to step back!
1 Comment
Further, back when birth rates were high, mothers were not expected to work full-time outside the home, nor to hand over their young kids to daycare of uncertain merits.
If they did work full-time, it didn’t happen until after the kids were in school.
Might be a few lessons there… Have kids when you’re young, at your best reproductive health, and have the youthful energy to handle a swarming brood, instead of waiting until you’re already tired of working, and adding children to your life is just too much.